1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 186 Cal.App.3d
  5. 186 Cal.App.3d 897 (1986)
 

BEATY v. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST.

Docket No. D003325.

186 Cal.App.3d 897 (1986)

231 Cal. Rptr. 128

GEORGE F. BEATY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

October 28, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Sutherland & Gerber and Randy J. Rutten for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Jennings, Engstrand & Henrikson, Gregory V. Moser, Horton, Knox, Carter & Foote, Redwine & Sherrill, Frederick A. Bryson and Gerald Shoaf for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

STANIFORTH, J.*

This case presents an issue of first impression: whether inverse condemnees are entitled to relocation assistance benefits under the Relocation Assistance Act (Act) (Gov. Code, § 7260 et seq.).1

Facts

The petitioners (hereafter sometimes collectively referred to as Beaty)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases