STATE BY SPANNAUS v. HEIMER

No. C8-85-2338.

393 N.W.2d 687 (1986)

STATE of Minnesota, by Warren SPANNAUS, its Attorney General, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Daniel HEIMER, et al., Lower Court Respondents, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied November 17, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Lloyd J. Moosbrugger, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Arthur O. Anselmo, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Transp. Duluth, for respondent.

Thomas R. Thibodeau, Joseph J. Roby, Jr., Johnson, Killen, Thibodeau, Seiler, P.A., Duluth, for appellant.

Heard, considered, and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and RANDALL, JJ.


OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

This is an appeal from an eminent domain proceeding. The only contested issue at trial was whether appellant, Burlington Northern Railroad (Burlington), received just compensation for a parcel of land condemned by the State in 1982 for use in extending Interstate Highway 35. The parcel is located in downtown Duluth.

In 1984, a panel of three court-appointed commissioners valued the parcel, approximately 32 acres, at $3,400...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases