Judgment affirmed.
The hearing court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress certain postarrest statements on the ground that his arrest was not based upon probable cause where the uncontroverted evidence established that the arresting officers knew that a crime had been committed, they observed the defendant fleeing from the scene of the crime and the defendant did not stop when one of the officers identified himself and ordered him to do so (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
