COOPER v. FORSYTH COUNTY HOSP. AUTHORITY, INC.

No. 85-1385.

789 F.2d 278 (1986)

Carlos T. COOPER, Jr., D.P.M. and E. Joseph Daniels, D.P.M., Appellants, v. FORSYTH COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, INC.; Jack P. Barrier, Marian F. Brower, Harley P. Graves, J. Clifton Harper, Kap H. Halverson, Kenneth A. Johnson, Eugene Rossitch, G. Dee Smith, Ann Spencer, Raymond D. Thomas, Martha J. Young, William F. Folds, M.D., David Nelson, M.D., William F. Sayers, M.D. and Louis Shaffner, M.D. individually and as trustees of Forsyth County Hospital Authority; George Podgorny, M.D.; Robert Means, M.D.; Jeff B. Helms, M.D.; Frank E. Pollock, M.D.; Kenneth G. Tomberlin, M.D.; John T. Hayes, M.D.; Richard P. Rose, M.D.; Robert G. Underdal, M.D.; Isabel Bittinger, M.D.; Jerome E. Jennings, M.D.; The Medical Society of the State of North Carolina and North Carolina Orthopedic Association, Inc., Appellees, and Carolyn Green, individually and as a trustee of Forsyth County Hospital Authority, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 24, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hamilton C. Horton, Jr. (T. Paul Hendrick, Horton, Hendrick & Kummer, Winston-Salem, N.C., on brief), for appellants.

Roddey M. Ligon, Jr. (Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, on brief), Winston-Salem, N.C., Samuel G. Thompson (John H. Anderson, Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, Raleigh, N.C., on brief), George L. Little, Jr. (F. Joseph Treacy, Jr., Petree, Stockton, Robinson, Vaughn, Glaze & Maready, Winston-Salem, N.C., Thomas E. Harris, Dorie Benesh Refling, Ward & Smith, P.A., New Bern, N.C., Edward J. Westbrook, Blatt & Fales, Barnwell, N.C., on brief), for appellees.

Before WIDENER, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.


ERVIN, Circuit Judge:

Doctor Carlos T. Cooper, Jr. and Doctor E. Joseph Daniels brought a private antitrust suit after being denied podiatric surgical privileges at Forsyth Memorial Hospital, alleging an anticompetitive conspiracy. They now appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment against them, 604 F.Supp. 685. Because appellants have failed to proffer sufficient evidence from which to infer a conspiracy, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases