ROLANDER v. MEEKER COUNTY

No. C4-86-225.

392 N.W.2d 675 (1986)

Lida E. ROLANDER and Doris L. Brambilla, individually and on Behalf of the State of Minnesota, Appellants, v. MEEKER COUNTY, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 2, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce E. Goldstein, Schermer, Schwappach, Borkon, Ramstead & Mariani, Ltd., Minneapolis, for appellants.

William H. Dolan, Meeker Co. Atty., Litchfield, for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and WOZNIAK and SEDGWICK, JJ.


OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

The court, on its own motion, stayed Meeker County's condemnation proceedings of appellants' land until such time as an environmental impact "study" could be undertaken and completed by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The reconstruction project did not qualify for a formal procedure as designated by the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act. The County moved to lift the stay that had been granted by the court. Appellants again...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases