STENKAMP v. STENKAMP

D-5125; CA A36805.

723 P.2d 336 (1986)

80 Or. App. 550

In the Matter of the Estate of John W. Stenkamp, Deceased. Dorothy L. STENKAMP, Personal Representative, Appellant, v. Michael STENKAMP, Patricia Whitehurst and Robert Stenkamp, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 6, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milo Pope, Mt. Vernon, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Kilpatricks & Pope, Mt. Vernon.

Maxwell Merrill, Bend, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Merrill & O'Sullivan, P.C., Bend.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Decedent's wife, who is also his personal representative, appeals the probate court's distribution of a specific devise to decedent's children. She contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the gift had not been adeemed. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we affirm.1

Decedent's will gave his three children "[m]y interest in the investment plan with United States National Bank of Oregon"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases