MUSQUIZ v. CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK

Docket No. B009327.

180 Cal.App.3d 876 (1986)

225 Cal. Rptr. 817

RICHARD M. MUSQUIZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

May 8, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Cecil E. Ricks, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Elwayne E. Smith, City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

JOHNSON, J.

The appellant, Musquiz, appeals from an order of the trial court denying his petition for alternative or peremptory writ of mandate and damages brought pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. Musquiz raises three central issues on appeal. First, did the respondent, Huntington Park City Council, exceed the proper scope of review during its examination of the findings and recommendations of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases