HOVER v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD.

C.M.L. No. 8. Civ. Nos. H-82-465(AHN), H-82-739(AHN), H-84-893(AHN) to H-84-897(AHN), H-84-941(AHN) and H-85-433(AHN).

678 F.Supp. 370 (1986)

Lillia B. HOVER, et al., v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., et al. William BOSTON, et al., v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., et al. Robert CHECHOSKI, et al., v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., et al. Raymond SMITH, et al., v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., et al. Viola MINAFRI v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., et al. David ATTARDO, et al., v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., et al. Ronald CRYOSKIE, et al., v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., et al. Donald J. LOMME, et al., v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., et al. Ralph SQUIER, et al., v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., et al.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

June 9, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Murphy, Jr., Robinson & Cole, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiffs.

Frederick B. Tedford, Joyce Lagnese, Danaher, Tedford, Lagnese and Neal, P.C., Hartford, Conn., for defendants.


RULING ON BELL ASBESTOS'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

NEVAS, District Judge.

Bell Asbestos Mines, Limited ("Bell Asbestos") is one of many defendants in the nine asbestos actions, based on diversity jurisdiction, captioned above and designated as C.M.L. No. 8. Plaintiffs seek damages for injuries caused by exposure to asbestos products at their place of employment, Raybestos-Manhattan Friction Materials Company ("Raymark"),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases