1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 724 P.2d
  5. 724 P.2d 319 (1986)
 

TELEDYNE WAH CHANG ALBANY v. POWELL

S33132.

724 P.2d 319 (1986)

301 Or. 590

TELEDYNE WAH CHANG ALBANY, Petitioner, v. John POWELL, James Denham, Lloyd K. Marbet, Gregory Kafoury, and the Honorable Arno Denecke, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon. In Banc.

Decided August 27, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard H. Williams, Portland, argued the cause and filed the Petition to Review Explanatory Statement for petitioner. With him on the petition was Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson & Young.

John A. Reuling, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the Answering Memorandum of the Atty. Gen. With him on the Answering Memorandum were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen. and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding to review the explanatory statement for Ballot Measure 15 prepared for inclusion in the voters' pamphlet for the November 4, 1986 election. The statement was prepared by a committee appointed pursuant to ORS 251.205. The committee filed the statement with the Secretary of State pursuant to ORS 251.255. Petitioner Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA) seeks review of the statement under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases