1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 724 P.2d
  5. 724 P.2d 315 (1986)
 

FERRARA v. RILEY

SC S33121.

724 P.2d 315 (1986)

301 Or. 579

Pamela A. FERRARA and Common Cause, Inc., Petitioners, v. Dan RILEY, Sylvia Zook, Liz Van Leeuwen, Jan Wyers, Bill McCoy, being members of the Voters' Pamphlet Explanatory Committee for Ballot Measure 13, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon. In Banc.

Decided August 27, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Botteri, Portland, argued the cause and filed the Petition to Review the Voters' Pamphlet Explanatory Statement for Ballot Measure 13.

John A. Reuling, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the Answering Memorandum of the Attorney General. With him on Answering Memorandum were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen. and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding brought under ORS 251.235 which permits any person who is dissatisfied with a voters' pamphlet ballot measure explanatory statement, for being insufficient or unclear, to petition this court to certify a different statement.1

The question here involves the explanatory statement for Ballot Measure 13 that will appear in the voters' pamphlet for the November 4, 1986 general election. Ballot...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases