1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 495 N.E.2d
  5. 495 N.E.2d 535 (1986)
 

RUTLEDGE v. STATE

No. 1185S445.

495 N.E.2d 535 (1986)

Roger D. RUTLEDGE, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

Supreme Court of Indiana.

July 25, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Soards, Soards & Carroll, Indianapolis, for appellant (defendant below).

Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Jay Rodia, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee (plaintiff below).

DICKSON, Justice.

Roger D. Rutledge, defendant-appellant, challenges his convictions for rape, a class A felony1, and attempted criminal deviate conduct, a class A felony2, on grounds that the evidence was insufficient.

In addressing the issue of sufficiency of evidence, we will affirm the conviction if, considering only the probative evidence and reasonable inferences supporting the verdict, without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases