1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 177 Cal.App.3d
  5. 177 Cal.App.3d 851 (1986)
 

SPINOSA v. ANDREWS

Docket No. A029485.

177 Cal.App.3d 851 (1986)

223 Cal. Rptr. 120

THOMAS SPINOSA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ADOLPHUS ANDREWS III et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

February 21, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Terence Faulkner and Thomas Spinosa, in pro. per., and Arlo Hale Smith for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

William F. Terheyden and Donald A. Casper for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

ELKINGTON, J.

The above-named plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying their application for a writ of mandate compelling defendant Republican County Central Committee of San Francisco and defendant Adolphus Andrews III, its chairman, to allow plaintiffs Spinosa, Faulkner, Woods, and Silvestri, two votes each at all meetings of defendant Republican County Central Committee.

On their appeal plaintiffs contend...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases