PEOPLE v. CYR


119 A.D.2d 901 (1986)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur R. Cyr, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

April 17, 1986


Levine, J.

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the sentence he received was harsh and excessive. He requests this court to consider his medical condition, age and family situation, and, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, modify his sentence pursuant to CPL 470.15.

Initially we note that we do not have jurisdiction to hear defendant's appeal as of right (see, CPL 450.10 [1]; People v Hickman,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases