CUTTER v. BROWNBRIDGE

Docket No. A024456.

183 Cal.App.3d 836 (1986)

228 Cal. Rptr. 545

NEWELL I. CUTTER II, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROBERT BROWNBRIDGE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

July 24, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Marvin Stender and Garry, Dreyfus & McTernan for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Martin F. McCarthy and Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

HOLMDAHL, J.

This case presents the issue of whether a party's psychotherapist is immune from liability for a disclosure of privileged information voluntarily made in a judicial proceeding, when that disclosure violates the patient's constitutional right of privacy.

The judgment dismissing the complaint with prejudice is reversed.

Statement of Facts<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases