STATE v. FORBORD

No. C9-86-933.

398 N.W.2d 618 (1986)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Bradley Keith FORBORD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 30, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Paul R. Kempainen, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, John W. Riches, II, Swift Co. Atty., Benson, for respondent.

John E. Mack, New London, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER and LESLIE, JJ.


OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

This appeal arises from convictions of possession and sale of marijuana in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 152.01, 152.02, 152.09, 152.15 (1986). Appellant contends the trial court erred by failing to dismiss the charges for lack of speedy arrest; by admitting into evidence a scale seized 16 months after the alleged violations; and by admitting illegally obtained marijuana into evidence for impeachment purposes. Because admission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases