SALDANA v. I.N.S.

Nos. 84-7118, 84-7549.

793 F.2d 222 (1986)

Herman SALDANA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 30, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heriberto Gonzales, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Dzintra Janavs, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.


DISSENT FROM DENIAL OF COURT TO CONSIDER THIS CASE EN BANC

SNEED, Circuit Judge, with whom KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc:

This case takes another large step toward limiting the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) discretion in deciding motions to reopen on the ground of extreme hardship. Because I believe the opinion goes beyond our precedents and is in conflict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases