1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 60 B.R.
  5. 60 B.R. 953 (1986)
 

IN RE RBA, INC.

Bankruptcy No. 4-79-1534, Adv. No. 4-82-252(O).

60 B.R. 953 (1986)

In re RBA, INC., a Minnesota Corporation, f/k/a Rauenhorst, Bellows & Associates, Inc., Debtor. Steven Bruce BOOKER, an Underwriter at Lloyd's, London, for Himself and Those Other Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Certificates 25R 23408, 25R 23409, 25R 23410, Plaintiff, v. STAUFFER SEEDS, INC., f/k/a RBA, Inc.; Garner Schmidt; Herman Fridgen, Jr.; Lawrence Wilt, Jr.; Rodger Brandt; Arlo Andrews; Walter Brandt; Leonard Westrom; Marcellus Dietz; Orval Rinke; Roger Schmidt; William Grimes; Conroy Farms, Inc.; Wilbert Rinke; Fuhrman Bros., a partnership; Robert Ringger; Eugene Borsheim; Donald Forcier; Dennis Groneberg; Merton Johnson; Thomas Monson, Sr.; Thiel Bros., a partnership; Boom Bros., a partnership; Marvin Wilts; George Libbon; Roger Frisch d/b/a Felix Frisch & Sons, Inc.; Dale Johnson; Eldren Lichtsinn; Richard Mathias; James Conroy; Melvin Brunkow & Sons; Lawrence Armbrust; Gerald Frisch; Ewald & Darrell Moerer; Donald Fuhrman; Martin Fuhrman; Gene Stueve; Gary Timm; Orville Brunkow; Thomas Conroy; Stan Zych; Brandt Farms, Inc.; Joseph Stueve; Austin Culp; and Walter Wulff, Defendants.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

May 23, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Walz, Best & Flanagan, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff, Steven Booker, et al.

Gerald T. Carroll, Carroll & Faulconer, Minneapolis, Minn., for Stauffer Seeds, Inc., formerly RBA, Inc.

Thomas C. Athens, Arvesen, Lundeen, Hoff, Svingen & Athens, Fergus Falls, Minn., Mr. Warrenn C. Anderson, Fluegel, Anderson, Dalager, Dalager & Seibel, Morris, Minn., for the named Farmers.

ORDER

PATRICK J. McNULTY, United States Magistrate.

The above-titled case came before the undersigned United States Magistrate, to whom it has been assigned for trial and all other proceedings in accordance with provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), upon post-trial motions. The Court has attempted to limit recitation of fact and procedural history to that which is essential to determination of the motions. This Order is concerned with motions by RBA...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases