1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 21 Ohio
  5. 21 Ohio St. 3d 80 (1986)
 

RUWE v. BD. OF CTY. COMMRS. OF HAMILTON CTY.

No. 85-210.

21 Ohio St. 3d 80 (1986)

RUWE ET AL., APPELLEES, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 15, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Condit, Dressing & Ruwe Co., L.P.A., John W. Dressing and Thomas J. Ruwe, for appellee Barbara A. Ruwe.

Perry L. Ancona, for appellee David Pinkelton.

John L. Heilbrun, for appellee Lawrence A. Pinkelton.

Arthur M. Ney, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and Brian E. Hurley, for appellants.

Per Curiam.

The narrow issue before us is whether summary judgment was properly granted for the Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County ("the commissioners") and for Donald Schramm, Hamilton County Engineer. We conclude summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons that follow.

We noted in the recent case of Heckert v. Patrick (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 402, that to ascertain a county...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases