1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 379 N.W.2d
  5. 379 N.W.2d 627 (1986)
 

SPEARMAN v. SALMINEN

No. C6-85-1348.

379 N.W.2d 627 (1986)

Richard F. SPEARMAN, Respondent, v. Audrey Lorraine SALMINEN, Respondent, Michael A. Salminen, Appellant, and Audrey Lorraine SALMINEN, Third Party Plaintiff, Respondent, v. Michael A. SALMINEN, Third Party Defendant, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 7, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Prebich, Abate, Wivoda, Clark & Prebich, Hibbing, for Richard F. Spearman.

Jack Fena, Hibbing, for Audrey Lorraine Salminen.

Michael A. Salminen, pro se.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and CRIPPEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Michael Salminen appeals from a declaratory judgment which determined respondent Audrey Salminen's rights under a previous decree of marriage dissolution. Michael claims the dissolution decree made Audrey liable for debts owed by a partnership formed by Michael and respondent Richard Spearman. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

The present controversy concerns a partnership known as SPAL Enterprises, formed by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases