1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 105 Wn.2d
  5. 105 Wn.2d 898 (1986)
 

STATE v. BRADLEY

No. 52130-1.

105 Wn.2d 898 (1986)

719 P.2d 546

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JOSEPH PAUL BRADLEY, ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

May 22, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis B. Arnold, for appellants.

John G. Wetle, Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

UTTER, J.

Joseph and Elizabeth Bradley appeal their convictions for the possession of cocaine. The Bradleys' central challenge is that the State cannot convict individuals on the basis of evidence that federal officials seized in violation of the state constitution. We do not agree with the Bradleys that Const. art. 1, § 7 requires exclusion of evidence seized by federal officials in a border search. We reject their other challenges and affirm the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases