Judgment affirmed.
Shortly after the commission of the crimes, while being interviewed by detectives, an accomplice of the defendant gave statements which implicated the defendant. The accomplice was not produced at trial and, over objection, her statements were admitted through the testimony of the detectives. The defendant contends that because he was unable to cross-examine the accomplice, he was denied his constitutional right to confrontation.
In spite...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
