OPINION
DUNN, Justice.
The appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of burglary of a habitation. His punishment, enhanced by one prior conviction, was assessed by the court at 17 years imprisonment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Appellant's sole ground of error is that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain the jury verdict. Because the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged, we will discuss the facts...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
