1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 127 Misc.2d
  5. 127 Misc.2d 859 (1985)
 

MTR BARNES v. URBAN RENEWAL

127 Misc.2d 859 (1985)

In the Matter of John R. Barnes, Doing Business as Riverwalk Associates, et al., Petitioners, v. Binghamton Urban Renewal Agency et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Broome County.

March 29, 1985

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Konstanty & Harlem for petitioners. Ball & McDonough, P. C., for Sarbro Realty Corporation, respondent. Kenneth Auerbach, Corporation Counsel, for Binghamton Urban Renewal Agency and another, respondents.

D. BRUCE CREW, III, J.

Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the designation by the Binghamton Urban Renewal Agency (BURA) of Sarbro Realty Corporation (Sarbro) as a qualified and eligible sponsor for the development of urban renewal site 5A, property which is owned by BURA. They also challenge the approval by the Binghamton City Council (City) of the sale by BURA of that property to Sarbro. Finally, petitioners seek review...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases