SCHOR v. COM. FUTURES TRADING COM'N

Nos. 83-1703, 83-1704.

770 F.2d 211 (1985)

William T. SCHOR, Petitioner, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, and ContiCommodity Services, Inc. and Richard L. Sandor, Respondents. MORTGAGE SERVICES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, and ContiCommodity Services, Inc. and Richard L. Sandor, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

August 13, 1985.


ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Opinion PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

In Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 740 F.2d 1262 (D.C.Cir.1984), we concluded that the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA or Act)1 did not empower the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or Commission) to adjudicate traditional contract claims governed by state law. In particular...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases