ELECTRICITIES OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
The SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 30, 1985.
October 30, 1985.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
John R. Jolly, Ernie K. Murray, Spruill and Spruill, Rocky Mount, N.C., James N. Horwood, Marc R. Poirier, Patricia E. Stack, Donald Weightman, Spiegel & McDiarmid, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.
Robert H. Forry, Robert P. Edwards, Jr., Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, Atlanta, Ga., Richard A. Vinroot, Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, Charlotte, N.C., John P. Scott, Jr., Balch and Bingham, Birmingham, Ala., Ben H. Stone, Eaton, Cottrell, Galloway, Lang & Stone, Gulfport, Miss., for The Southern Co., Georgia Power Co., Alabama Power Co., Gulf Power Co., Mississippi Power Co.
Thomas J. Bolch, Raleigh, N.C., for Southeastern Power Resources Committee.
Lawrence W. Hewitt, Berry, Hogewood, Edwards & Freeman, Charlotte, N.C., Reuben Goldberg, Channing D. Strother, Jr., Goldberg, Fieldman & Letham, Washington, D.C., for Alabama Cities.
L. Clifford Adams, Jr., Heard, Leverett & Adams, Atlanta, Ga., Clifton A. Vince, Bernhardt K. Wruble, Nancy A. Wodka, Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson & Hand, Washington, D.C., Dean Gibson, Berry, Hogewood, Edwards & Freeman, Charlotte, N.C., for Municipal Electric Authority of Ga.
C. Max Vassanelli, Drake Cutini, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Washington, D.C., Charles R. Brewer, U.S. Atty., Charlotte, N.C., for Federal defendants.
Denver L. Rampey, Southeastern Power Admin., Elberton, Ga., for Southeastern Power Admin.
United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.
ORDER
ROBERT D. POTTER, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment.1
INTRODUCTION
The Plaintiff alleges that the Federal Government Defendants have violated Section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 1944, 16 U.S.C. § 825s, by failing to give preference to its service area members in the sale and other allocation of hydroelectric energy...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
