BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants.
and
Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative, Inc., Tex-La Electric Cooperative, Inc., et al., Defendant-Intervenors.
United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Waco Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 30, 1985.
December 30, 1985.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
R. Coke Mills and Joseph Robert Riley, Mills, Riley & Millar, Waco, Tex., Robert A. Jablon, Cynthia S. Bogorad, Donald Weightman, Spiegel & McDiarmid, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.
Helen Milburn Eversberg, U.S. Atty., W.D. of Tex., San Antonio, Tex., Dennis G. Linder, Mac Vassamelli, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants, Southwestern Power Admin., William H. Clagett, Dept. of Energy and Donald Hodel.
Robert D. Willis, Livingston, Tex., for defendant-intervenor Southwestern Power Resources Ass'n, Inc.
Clinton A. Vince, Bernhardt K. Wruble and Paul E. Nordstrom, Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard & McPherson, Washington, D.C., Phillip E. McCleery, Sheehy, Lovelace & Mayfield, P.C., Waco, Tex., for defendant-intervenor Rayburn Country Elec. Co-op. Inc.
Ralph J. Gillis, Hingham, Mass., Robert D. Willis, Livingston, Tex., for defendants-intervenors Sam Rayburn Dam Elec. Co-op. Inc. and Sam Rayburn Mun. Power Agency, Inc.
Ralph J. Gillis, Hingham, Mass., for defendant-intervenor Sam Rayburn G & T, Inc.
William H. Burchette, Christine C. Ryan, Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell, Washington, D.C., Richard C. Balough, Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell, Austin, Tex., for defendant-intervenor Tex-La Elec. Co-op. Inc. and Texas Elec. Co-op. of Texas.
United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Waco Division.
ORDER
WALTER S. SMITH, Jr., District Judge.
Came on this day to be considered the motions for summary judgment filed by each of the parties. Having reviewed the numerous and voluminous briefs and supporting documents filed by all parties and after considering said material and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is properly denied and Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment are properly granted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
