1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 371 N.W.2d
  5. 371 N.W.2d 596 (1985)
 

POMIJE v. SCHEIBER

No. C4-84-1841.

371 N.W.2d 596 (1985)

Donald G. POMIJE, et al., Appellants, v. Leo A. SCHEIBER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 23, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore R. Mellby, Montgomery, for Donald Pomije.

Keith D. Johnson, Wold, Jacobs & Johnson, Minneapolis, for Helen M. Pomije.

Marvin E. Lundquist, Mankato, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and FORSBERG and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants, Donald G. and Helen M. Pomije, appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial. They assert that the jury verdict in their action for damages and loss of consortium was the result of passion and prejudice, that the damages are inadequate, and that the trial court improperly instructed the jury. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 17, 1978, a vehicle driven...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases