C & T RECREATION, INC. v. CANNON MINNESOTA

No. C7-84-1669.

367 N.W.2d 591 (1985)

C & T RECREATION, INC., etc., et al., Respondents, v. CANNON MINNESOTA CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 14, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Ballenthin, Minneapolis, for appellants.

John J. Bowden, St. Paul, for respondents.

Heard, considered, and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and PARKER and HUSPENI, JJ.


OPINION

WOZNIAK, Presiding Judge.

Cannon Minnesota appeals from an order denying its motion for an amended answer and counterclaim. The trial court found that Cannon had not brought the motion in good faith, finding it to be a collateral attack on the judgment sale, and assessed attorney's fees against Cannon in the amount of $1,168. C & T seeks review of its motion to strike, which was denied as moot. We affirm.

FACTS AND BACKGROUND LITIGATION...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases