GARDINER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 84-985.

499 A.2d 455 (1985)

Wayne A. GARDINER, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided October 31, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur M. Reynolds, Jr., Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Charlotte Brookins-Pruitt, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Inez Smith Reid, Corp. Counsel, John H. Suda, Principal Deputy Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for appellee.

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, BELSON, Associate Judge, and REILLY, Senior Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks reversal of an order striking his answer and entering judgment by default in a libel action for forfeiture of certain jewelry. We hold that the motions court abused its discretion in entering that order and remand the action for further proceedings.

At issue is the sanction imposed on Wayne A. Gardiner for failure to make discovery. The District of Columbia instituted the civil action by filing a libel of information for forfeiture...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases