Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
Petitioner conceded that the determination that he did not adequately carry out his responsibilities as laboratory director was supported by substantial evidence. In view of the potential danger to the public arising from petitioner's nonfeasance, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
