Judgment affirmed.
Defendant did not request a charge that witness Donald Ingram was an accomplice as a matter of law whose testimony needed to be corroborated, and did not take exception to the failure to so charge. He similarly declined to request that the court submit to the jury for their factual determination the question of whether Ingram was an accomplice or to except to the absence of such a charge. Thus, these issues are unpreserved for appellate review ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.