1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 109 A.D.2d
  5. 109 A.D.2d 828 (1985)
 

NAPOLI v. CARRANO

109 A.D.2d 828 (1985)

Peter Napoli, Respondent, v. Alfred Carrano, Appellant. In the Matter of Peter Napoli, Petitioner, Alfred Carrano et al., Appellants, and Doris Carrano, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 18, 1985

Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We find no merit to appellants' claim that Peter Napoli's employment was at will. There is an implicit exception in provisions requiring unanimous consent to remove an employee where removal is for good cause shown (Fells v Katz, 256 N.Y. 67). The purported reasons given by appellant Carrano were mere pretexts for his action and Special Term correctly concluded that they were insufficient to constitute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases