PER CURIAM.
There is no competent, substantial evidence in the record which demonstrates either that the officer in question complied with the "knock-and-announce" statutes, §§ 901.19(1), 933.09, Fla. Stat. (1983), or that any cognizable exception to the statutory requirements applied. Hence, the order denying the defendant's motion to suppress was erroneous, State v. Navarro,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.