1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 327 S.E.2d
  5. 327 S.E.2d 606 (1985)
 

STATE v. COFFEY

No. 8425SC638.

327 S.E.2d 606 (1985)

STATE of North Carolina v. Carol COFFEY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 2, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Gen. Ellen B. Scouten, Raleigh, for the State.

Whisnant, Simmons, Groome & Pike by Fred D. Pike, Lenoir, for defendant-appellant.

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant contends inter alia the court erred because there was insufficient evidence to support its findings, conclusions and judgments. All that is needed to support the judgment revoking defendant's probation is evidence which "reasonably satisfies the trial judge in the exercise of his sound discretion that the defendant has violated a valid condition on which the sentence was suspended." State v. Freeman, 47 N.C. App. 171, 175,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases