Judgment affirmed.
The hearing court correctly determined that the witnesses' identification of defendant all had sufficient independent sources, and that, under the circumstances, the viewing of a photograph of defendant found in an automobile believed to have been involved in the robbery, did not taint the identifications. Neither is defendant entitled to a new trial because the prosecutor allegedly improperly questioned alibi witnesses about their failure to come...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.