1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 374 N.W.2d
  5. 374 N.W.2d 553 (1985)
 

BRAKKE v. HILGERS

No. C1-85-799.

374 N.W.2d 553 (1985)

Ronald BRAKKE, et al., Appellants, v. Thomas HILGERS, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 1, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald Brakke, pro se.

Zenas Baer, Wefald & Baer, Hawley, for respondents Hilgers.

David S. Maring, Cahill, Jeffries & Maring, Moorhead, for respondent Zenas Baer.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and SEDGWICK and LANSING, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

After cancellation of a contract for deed the vendees, Ronald and Jean Brakke, sued the vendors, Thomas and Patricia Hilgers and the vendors' attorney, Zenas Baer, claiming: (1) the Hilgers had a duty of forbearance and should not have strictly applied the statutory cancellation proceeding; (2) Baer wrongfully interfered and incompetently advised the Hilgers; (3) the Hilgers and Baer conspired to trespass on the Brakkes' property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases