UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN TEL. AND TEL. CO.

Civ. A. No. 82-0192.

604 F.Supp. 316 (1985)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 9, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Denvir, Michael F. Altschul, Luin P. Fitch, J. Philip Sauntry, Jr., Antitrust Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S. Dept. of Justice.

Alfred A. Green, Francine J. Berry, Jim G. Kilpatric, John D. Zeglis, New York City, Lee M. Mitchell, Ben W. Heineman, Jr., Washington, D.C., for American Telephone and Telegraph Co.; Howard J. Trienens, George V. Cook, William L. Keefauver, Sidley & Austin, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

James D. Ellis, John S. Luckstone, Joseph A. Klein, Charles P. Featherstun, Livingston, N.J., for Bell Operating Companies.

R.V.R. Dalenberg, Robert L. Barada, Marion J. Stanton, San Francisco, Cal., for Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell.

J. Roger Wollenberg, Roger M. Whitten, Margaret L. Tobey, Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, James E. Magee, Washington, D.C., for intervenor GTE Sprint Communications.

Chester T. Kamin, Michael H. Salsbury, Jenner & Block, John R. Worthington, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, MCI Communications Corp., Washington, D.C., for MCI Communications Corp.

Sean A. McCarthy, McLean, Va., for Satellite Business Systems; William E. Willis, Margaret K. Pfeiffer, Robert B. Bell, Sullivan & Cromwell, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

James M. Lyons, Frederick J. Baumann, Rothgerber, Appel & Powers, Denver, Colo., for Utah Public Service Commission.

Neil F. Hartigan, Atty. Gen. of the State of Ill., Hercules F. Bolos, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief Counsel — III — CC, E. King Poor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chicago, Ill., for Illinois Commerce Commission.

Stephen G. Oxley, Asst. Secretary and Staff Counsel, Cheyenne, Wyo., for Public Service Commission of Wyoming.


MEMORANDUM

HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.

The issue before the Court is whether AT & T's database system should be made available to the Operating Companies on a temporary basis as a means of enabling other interexchange carriers to operate a sophisticated "800 Service" system.

On July 8, 1983, this Court entered an Order approving the Plan of Reorganization submitted by AT & T and the Department of Justice1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases