1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 369 N.W.2d
  5. 369 N.W.2d 551 (1985)
 

KIESS v. HAMANN

No. C9-85-226.

369 N.W.2d 551 (1985)

Notker A. KIESS, Respondent, v. Raymond HAMANN, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 18, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Wocken, Cold Spring, for respondent.

Daniel A. Eller, St. Cloud, for appellants.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER and FOLEY, JJ., with oral argument waived.

SUMMARY OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Respondent brought an action to have appellants remove a portion of their fence from respondent's land. The parties presented conflicting surveys regarding the location of the driveway relative to the boundary of their property. The trial court adopted the survey which was approved by an arbitration committee of the Minnesota Land Surveyors. The survey adopted by the trial court showed that except for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases