1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 606 F.Supp.
  5. 606 F.Supp. 300 (1985)
 

RUSH v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC.

No. 84 Civ. 3219 (RWS).

606 F.Supp. 300 (1985)

R. Stockton RUSH III, Plaintiff, v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC. and Scott Seskis, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 22, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lovell & Stewart, New York City, for plaintiff; Victor E. Stewart, New York City, of counsel.

Joan Caridi, New York City, for defendant Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. ("Oppenheimer") and Scott Seskis ("Seskis") have moved to sever the pendent common law claims, to compel arbitration of those claims, and to stay this arbitration until final resolution of the federal securities law claims. The motion is denied.

Prior Proceedings

R. Stockton Rush III ("Rush") commenced this action by filing a complaint on May 10, 1984. Count one alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases