1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 367 N.W.2d
  5. 367 N.W.2d 539 (1985)
 

STATE v. ERICKSON

No. C1-84-1568.

367 N.W.2d 539 (1985)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Mary Lou ERICKSON and William E. Erickson, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 23, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Nicole E. Nee, Smith, Juster, Feikema, Malmon & Haskvitz, Asst. City Pros., Fridley, for respondent.

Stephen R. Nicol, Barna, Guzy, Merrill, Hynes & Giancola, Ltd., Minneapolis, for appellants.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and HUSPENI, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Appellants William and Mary Erickson were convicted of violating various public nuisance ordinances of the City of Fridley. On appeal they claim serialized prosecution, inadequate notice, and that the ordinance is vague and overbroad. We affirm.

FACTS

The Ericksons live in a residential area within the City of Fridley. They have been involved in a dispute with the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases