1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 367 N.W.2d
  5. 367 N.W.2d 536 (1985)
 

BOOM v. BOOM

No. C2-83-1956.

367 N.W.2d 536 (1985)

Eleanor Louis BOOM, Respondent, v. Rolland David BOOM, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied June 27, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Van Nostrand, Wheaton, for respondent.

John E. Mack, New London, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, Chief Judge, and SEDGWICK, and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Appellant Rolland Boom and respondent Eleanor Boom both challenge the trial court's division of property. Rolland also alleges the trial court erred: (1) in amending its judgment decree without any findings, explanation or justification; and (2) awarding Eleanor attorney fees. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Rolland and respondent Eleanor Boom were married in 1951. They separated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases