MIDDLETON v. MURFF

No. C-3840.

689 S.W.2d 212 (1985)

Bernard L. MIDDLETON, et al., Petitioners, v. Bonner D. MURFF, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 1, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williamson, Gardner, Hall and Wiesenthal, Anthony W. Hall, Jr., Houston, for petitioners.

Cannon, Cannon and Reed, Joe Cannon, Groesbeck, for respondents.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a direct attack on a "consent judgment" rendered by the district court after receiving notice that certain parties, petitioners herein, no longer consented. The consent judgment was not appealed to the court of appeals. This direct attack, brought in the district court, is a motion to vacate the consent judgment and does not conform to the requirements of a bill of review. The trial court refused...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases