HILL v. JENKINS

No. 83 C 3533.

620 F.Supp. 272 (1985)

Jesse HILL, Plaintiff, v. Harold JENKINS, Andrew L. Rodez and the Village of Maywood, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

September 18, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ruth Van Demark, c/o Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

John B. Murphey and Ronald Cope and Cary Schwimmer, Ancel, Glink, Diamond, Murphy & Cope, P.C., Chicago, Ill., for defendants.


ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

The Court's last encounter with this case was on Defendants', Harold Jenkins ("JENKINS"), Andrew Rodez ("RODEZ") and the Village of Maywood ("VILLAGE"), Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. That motion was granted in part and denied in part; the fourth and fourteenth amendment claims remain. All Defendants now move for summary judgment.

Federal Rule 56(c) provides for the entry of summary judgment if the record on the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases