HARRIS v. CRAIG

No. 141, 986; CA A30282; SC S30974.

697 P.2d 189 (1985)

299 Or. 12

Arnold Maxwell HARRIS, Petitioner On Review, v. Dr. E.W.S. CRAIG, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided March 26, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold Maxwell Harris, petitioner on review, argued the cause and submitted briefs pro se.

Edward L. Clark, Jr., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the briefs were Griffith C. Steinke and Clark, Marsh, Lindauer, McClinton and Vollmar, Salem.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, who was imprisoned under a felony conviction, sued defendant for damages, alleging medical malpractice. The trial court dismissed the complaint as barred by the statute of limitations, over plaintiff's objection that ORS 12.160(3) extends the period during which an imprisoned person may commence an action for a period up to five years. The trial court held that this extension of time was implicitly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases