ZURICH INS. CO. v. DIVERSIFIED RISK MANAGEMENT

82-08701; 82-08700; CA A33657; SC S31566.

706 P.2d 178 (1985)

300 Or. 47

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPENSATION OF DANNY D. KISHPAUGH, Claimant. ZURICH Insurance Company, Insurer, Respondent On Review, v. DIVERSIFIED RISK MANAGEMENT, Insurer, Respondent On Review, Danny D. Kishpaugh, Claimant, Petitioner On Review, American Strevell, Employer.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 17, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo R. Probst, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Deborah L. Sather, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review Zurich Ins. Co. With her on the response to the petition for review was Moscato & Byerly, Portland.

No appearance for respondent on review Diversified Risk Management.


CAMPBELL, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction to hear a workers' compensation appeal if the petitioner fails to give notice to all parties who appeared in the proceedings below. The Court of Appeals dismissed claimant's Petition for Judicial Review (notice of appeal) for lack of jurisdiction after claimant did not serve a copy on a party to the proceeding before the Workers' Compensation Board. We affirm.

Claimant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases