PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. v. LINDLEY

No. 84-850.

17 Ohio St. 3d 71 (1985)

PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. LINDLEY, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 15, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Taliaferro, Smith, Mann, Wolnitzek & Schachter, David S. Mann, Dinsmore & Shohl and William D. Howe, for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Mark A. Engel, for appellee.


WRIGHT, J.

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether appellant's purchase of artwork from outside artists, which artwork is subsequently transferred to appellant's packaging or advertising materials suppliers, is exempt from sales and use taxes pursuant to R.C. 5739.01(E)(1) and 5741.02(C)(2). Appellant claims these exemptions on the basis that it "resells" the artwork to its suppliers. For the reasons that follow, this

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases