WATKINS, Judge.
The issue presented in this case was raised by this Court, ex proprio motu, as to whether the judgment from which appeal was taken is properly appealable.
On February 23, 1983, judgment was rendered at trial on the merits at which counsel for plaintiff was present, but, by prior agreement, neither defendant nor his counsel was present.
The judgment was signed both by counsel and by the trial judge. Counsel for plaintiff requested that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
