CHODOS v. FLANZER


109 A.D.2d 771 (1985)

Diane Chodos et al., Appellants, v. Robert S. Flanzer, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 11, 1985


Judgment affirmed, with costs.

After extensive expert testimony concerning the procedures used by defendant in treating plaintiff wife's periodontal disease, the jury found that defendant was not negligent. "The weight to be afforded the conflicting testimony of experts is a matter peculiarly within the province of the jury" (Sternemann v Langs, 93 A.D.2d 819). On this record, it cannot be said that the jury verdict is against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases