1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 486 So.2d
  5. 486 So.2d 393 (1985)
 

CITY OF TUSKEGEE v. LACEY

84-415.

486 So.2d 393 (1985)

CITY OF TUSKEGEE, et al. v. Andrew J. LACEY, et al.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied and Special Concurrence Modified March 31, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred D. Gray and Walter E. McGowan of Gray, Langford, Sapp, Davis & McGowan, Tuskegee, for appellants.

Ira De Ment and Joan Van Almen of De Ment & Wise, Montgomery, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment from which this appeal is taken recites the following facts:

This is the Macon County dog track annexation case. The City of Tuskegee undertook to annex into its city limits the Macon County dog track property by landowners' consent and ordinance, as authorized in Alabama Code section 11-42-21. Prior to this annexation, the dog track property was about fourteen miles from the nearest property within Tuskegee's city...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases