JECKELL v. ARKELL

No. C3-85-173.

374 N.W.2d 503 (1985)

Elmer JECKELL, Appellant v. Raymond ARKELL, Jr., et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 17, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Brian O'Leary, O'Leary & Moritz, Chtd., Springfield, for appellant.

Paul N. Muske, Muske, Muske & Boyle, Springfield, for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and FOLEY and LESLIE, JJ.


OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

Appellant disputes numerous findings of the trial court in a partnership dissolution case where the court determined that appellant owes respondent over $14,000. Respondent also disputes some specific findings which he claims were clearly erroneous. We affirm.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiff-appellant, Elmer Jeckell, and defendant-respondent, Raymond Arkell, Jr., are brothers-in-law. Both are farmers, and from 1969 until...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases